Skip to content
Saturday, October 17, 2026
London Lounge Corner

The Venezuelan Crisis Could Now Determine President Trump's Political Legacy - and the United States' Position in the World

Following launching a night of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump seems to be entering the state-building arena.

In a striking news conference at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Saturday morning, the commander-in-chief stated that US forces had successfully seized Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an overnight raid in Caracas.

Trump then indicated that a team including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, working with Venezuelans, would be taking control of the embattled nation.

"We are going to administer the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and careful transition," he said.

What exactly "managing the nation" entails is ambiguous, but the commitment represents an dramatic shift in direction for the president, laden with inconsistencies and daunting obstacles.

A leader who ran on opposing "forever wars", who vehemently denounced past US attempts at regime change and who promised to implement an "America first" foreign policy is now gambling his presidency on effectively rebuilding a South American nation whose economy is collapsed and whose governmental stability has been eroded by decades of authoritarian rule.

Yet, Trump was unwaveringly optimistic.

He claimed his administration has a "perfect track record of winning" – and that this would be no different. He promised to enlist American oil firms to repair Venezuela's deteriorating production infrastructure, providing capital for the American reconstruction efforts and benefitting the Venezuelan people.

He did not exclude sending American soldiers to Venezuela to progress these efforts. "We're not afraid of boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he informed reporters.

Trump, a sharp critic of the US intervention of Iraq, will now have to heed the words of one of the American planners of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "You break it, you bought it."

An Altered International Stance

The US has reshaped Venezuela's destiny – whether for good or ill.

Trump took office nearly a year ago promising to be a diplomat, but over the past year he has demonstrated that he is more than willing to use military force around the globe.

In the past week, he ordered airstrikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he struck nuclear facilities in Iran, alleged narco-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, rebel forces in Yemen, militias in Somalia and jihadist fighters in Iraq.

In contrast to past operations, which have mostly involved missiles and warplanes that reduce the risk of American forces to harm, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his pledges to the future of that nation – are notably distinct.

His goal, he said during his press conference, is to "make Venezuela great again."

Response at Home and Abroad

That play on Trump's "Make America Great Again" – or Maga - mantra could be tough for some of Trump's followers to accept.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump loyalist who broke with the president after charging him of deserting his core supporters, was swift to denounce the president's actions on social media.

"Public outrage with our own government's perpetual military aggression and backing for overseas conflicts is justified because we are compelled to finance it," she stated. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. How mistaken we were."

Another notable Trump detractor, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, contrasted the official rationale for Maduro's arrest – on weapons and cocaine trafficking charges – with Trump's reasoning that the operation was to retake confiscated US oil and halt fentanyl production.

The majority of Republican lawmakers stood by the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson describing the military action against a "criminal regime" as "firm and legitimate".

Policy Rationales and Worldwide Consequences

During his press conference, the president argued the Venezuelan operation furthered his "America First" agenda because it guaranteed US regional security and provided a reliable source of oil.

He resurrected the Monroe Doctrine – an early 19th Century American diplomatic policy that asserted the Western Hemisphere should be free from influence by European powers – and rebranded it the "Trump Doctrine."

The move in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "US supremacy in the Western Hemisphere will never be challenged again."

The purpose of the new US security policy, he said, was to "safeguard commerce, territory and assets that are central to our national security." He labeled the Western Hemisphere as America's "backyard."

Trump's decision to apprehend Maduro will raise larger questions in international relations, however, and impact American relations with the world's other major military powers.

The Chinese foreign ministry released a statement expressing shock and condemning what it said was a irresponsible assault on a independent country.

During the Biden administration, the US offered comparable condemnations of Russia following its invasion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is attempting to broker a peace deal between those two nations – one that has often appeared to be leaning to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a centrist Republican congressman, voiced worry about the precedent Trump's actions might send.

"My main worry is now Russia will use this to justify their unlawful and brutal military actions against Ukraine, or China to justify an attack of Taiwan."

Political Criticism and Constitutional Questions

Trump's Democratic critics were blunter.

"America should not be managing other countries for any reason," said a senator who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "We should have understood by now not to get entangled in endless wars and overthrow attempts that carry catastrophic results for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a criminal and a dictator with a record of rights violations. But he condemned Trump's choice not to consult with legislative leaders before initiating the attack.

"The President has the constitutional responsibility to abide by the law and uphold democratic norms in the United States," he said. "That is what placing America First requires."

Trump, in his press conference, explained that he opted not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "disclose" details of the operation before the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That military operation was a triumph – with zero American deaths and minimal harm to US assets. Trump, with his characteristic bravado, portrayed the operation as a "daring raid" and "among the most astonishing, effective and impressive displays of American military might and proficiency in American history."

Now he is gambling his legacy on that success continuing, as the US claims it will assume responsibility for running and rebuilding Venezuela - though what that truly entails is unknown. He and his team must fortify a nation that has been in turmoil for decades while calming a hemisphere that is sure to be apprehensive of what Trump's foreign policy has planned for them.

KM
About the author

Kristen Monroe

A lifelong Londoner with a passion for uncovering the city's hidden corners and sharing her finds.

London Lounge Corner

Type to search articles.